4.2 Article

Absolute lymphocyte count on day 30 is a surrogate for robust hematopoietic recovery and strongly predicts outcome after T cell-depleted allogeneic stem cell transplantation

期刊

BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 1216-1223

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.07.005

关键词

AML; ALL; CML; day 30 lymphocyte count; allogeneic stem cell transplantation

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [ZIA HL006105-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several studies have shown that a higher lymphocyte count 3-4 weeks after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is associated with better transplant outcome. However, the factors determining early lymphocyte recovery are not defined. To further explore the relationship between lymphocyte recovery and outcome we analyzed lymphocyte counts and other engraftment parameters in 157 patients with leukemia (48 acute myelogenous leukemia, 80 chronic myelogenous leukemia, and 29 acute lymphoblastic leukemia [ALL]) receiving T cell-depleted mycloablative SCT from an HLA-identical sibling. In multivariate analysis the day 30 absolute lymphocyte count (LC30) above the median of 450/mu L was associated with improved survival (71% +/- 5% versus 38% +/- 6%, P < .0001), less relapse (21% +/- 5% versus 44% +/- 7%, P = .009), less nonrelapse mortality (NRM; 9 +/- 3 versus 36% +/- 6%, P < .0001) and less acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) (34% +/- 5% versus 51% +/- 6%, P = .025). The beneficial effect of a higher LC30 influenced outcome in patients with both standard and high-risk disease but did not affect survival and relapse in ALL. We found that a higher LC30 correlated with higher lymphocyte counts at all time points between 30 and 90 days post-SCT and also with more rapid neutrophil and platelet engraftment. These results indicate that LC30 is a surrogate for robust engraftment and identifies an at-risk population of patients after T cell-depleted SCT. (C) 2007 American Society fir Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据