4.3 Article

The effectiveness of antidepressant medication in the management of behaviour problems in adults with intellectual disabilities:: a systematic review

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH
卷 51, 期 -, 页码 750-765

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00935.x

关键词

adults; antidepressants; behaviour problem; intellectual disabilities; systematic review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background A comprehensive systematic review was performed to establish the current evidence base regarding the effectiveness of antidepressant medication for the management of behaviour problems in adults with intellectual disabilities. Method An electronic search of PsycInfo, Embase, Medline and Cinahl databases was conducted spanning the time period 1990 to October 2005 for primary trials. This was supplemented by hand searching and cross-referencing of relevant reviews. Strict scientific methodology requirements were formulated that the studies had to meet in order to merit inclusion in this review. Results One crossover randomized controlled trial in a small cohort, seven prospective uncontrolled trials and two retrospective studies were yielded in the search. Of these, one explored the effectiveness of the tricyclic antidepressant - clomipramine, and nine considered various selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Conclusions Evidence based primarily on a small number of either prospective or retrospective case studies that included a small number of participants and often used non-validated outcome measures for a short period of follow-up, suggests that antidepressants, particularly SSRIs, show improvement of aggression and self-injurious behaviour on average in less than 50% of cases and the rest show either no improvement or deterioration. The effect is most pronounced in the presence of an underlying anxiety or an associated diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Most studies have highlighted the concern regarding adverse effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据