4.3 Review

On the further integration of cooperative breeding and cooperation theory

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES
卷 76, 期 2, 页码 170-181

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.06.013

关键词

cooperative breeding; cooperation theory; pseudo-reciprocity; reciprocity; multi-level selection; by-product mutualism

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/D000394/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a synopsis about the commentaries to the target article Integrating cooperative breeding into theoretical concepts of cooperation, in which we attempted to integrate general mechanisms to explain cooperative behaviour among unrelated individuals with classic concepts to explain helping behaviour in cooperative breeders that do not invoke kin-based benefits. Here we (1) summarize the positions of the commentators concerning the main issues we raised in the target article and discuss important criticisms and extensions. (2) We relate our target article to some recent reviews on the evolution of cooperation and, (3) clarify how we use terminology with regard to cooperation and cooperative behaviour. (4) We discuss several aspects that were raised with respect to cooperative interactions including by-product mutualism, generalised reciprocity and multi-level selection and, (5) examine the alternatives to our classification scheme as proposed by some commentaries. (6) Finally, we highlight several aspects that might hinder the application of game theoretical mechanisms of cooperation in cooperatively breeding systems. Although there is broad agreement that cooperative breeding theory should be integrated within the more general concepts of cooperation, there is some debate about how this may be achieved. We conclude that the contributions in this special issue provide a fruitful first step and ample suggestions for future directions with regard to a more unified framework of cooperation in cooperative breeders. (C) 2007 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据