4.5 Article

Prospective study of interleukin-6 and the risk of malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmia in ICD-recipients - A pilot study

期刊

CYTOKINE
卷 40, 期 1, 页码 30-34

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2007.07.187

关键词

lnterleukin-6; ventricular tachycardia; ventricular fibrillation; implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We investigated the relationship between interleukin-6 (IL-6) and the risk of experiencing spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT/VF) in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Background: Cytokine levels predict outcome in patients with advanced heart failure and are elevated in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Regarding heart rhythm disturbances, proinflammatory activity could predict the occurrence of atrial fibrillation. There is no data on cytokine levels and the risk of spontaneous VT/VF. Methods: IL-6 serum concentrations were determined at baseline and follow-up in 47 consecutive ICD-patients with CAD and idiopathic dilated cardiornyopathy (IDC). Data were prospectively correlated with VT/VF-incidence. Results: Thirty-six patients (76.6%) suffered from CAD and II (23.4%) from IDC. Mean serum concentrations of IL-6 at baseline and at 9 months follow-up were 6.12 +/- 4.98 and 4.63 +/- 6.97. 88 spontaneous VT/VF-events occurred in 13/47 patients (27.7%). Patients with VT/VF had significantly higher IL-6 levels as compared to patients without VT/VF (8.96 +/- 5.97 vs. 5.04 +/- 4.16 pg/ml at baseline (P = 0.03), 7.8 +/- 4.88 vs. 3.42 +/- 6.32 pg/ml at follow-up (p = 0.01)). Conclusions: Elevated IL-6 serum concentrations were prospectively associated with an increased risk of spontaneous VT/VF-events in ICD-patients with CAD or IDC. These preliminary findings support a possible association of proinflammatory activity and an increased susceptibility to spontaneous VT/VF-events. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据