4.6 Article

Star formation in isolated AMIGA galaxies: dynamical influence of bars

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 474, 期 1, 页码 43-+

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077650

关键词

galaxies : general; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : kinematics and dynamics; galaxies : spiral; galaxies : statistics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. Star formation depends strongly on both the local environment of galaxies and the internal dynamics of the interstellar medium. To disentangle the two effects, we obtained, in the framework of the AMIGA project, H-alpha and Gunn r photometric data for more than 200 spiral galaxies lying in very low-density regions of the local Universe. Aims. We characterise the H-alpha emission, tracing current star formation, of the 45 largest and least inclined galaxies observed for which we estimate the torques between the gas and the bulk of the optical matter. We subsequently study the H-alpha morphological aspect of these isolated spiral galaxies. Methods. Using Fourier analysis, we focus on the modes of the spiral arms and also on the strength of the bars, computing the torques between the gas and newly formed stars ( Ha), and the bulk of the optical matter ( Gunn r). Results. We interpret the various bar/spiral morphologies observed in terms of the secular evolution experienced by galaxies in isolation. We also classify the different spatial distributions of star forming regions in barred galaxies. The observed frequency of particular patterns brings constraints on the lifetime of the various evolution phases. We propose an evolutive sequence accounting for the transitions between the different phases we observed. Conclusions. Isolated galaxies do not appear to be preferentially barred or unbarred. Fitting the H-alpha distributions using numerical simulations yields constraints on the star formation law, which is likely to differ from a genuine Schmidt law. In particular, it is probable that the relative velocity of the gas in the bar also needs to be taken into account.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据