4.7 Article

Unstable and stable flow boiling in parallel microchannels and in a single microchannel

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
卷 50, 期 21-22, 页码 4297-4310

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.01.033

关键词

boiling instability heat transfer; microchannels; instability; reversed flow

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simultaneous visualization and measurement study have been carried out to investigate flow boiling instabilities of water in microchannels at various heat fluxes and mass fluxes. Two separate flow boiling experiments were conducted in eight parallel silicon microchannels (with flow interaction from neighboring channels at headers) and in a single microchannel (without flow interaction), respectively. These microchannels, at a length of 30 mm, had an identical trapezoidal cross-section with a hydraulic diameter of 186 pm. At a given heat flux and inlet water temperature, it was found that stable and unstable flow boiling regimes existed, depending on the mass flux. A flow boiling map, in terms of heat flux vs mass flux, showing stable flow boiling regime and unstable flow boiling regime is presented for parallel microchannels as well as for a single microchannel, respectively, at an inlet water temperature of 35 degrees C. In the stable flow boiling regime, isolated bubbles were generated and were pushed away by the incoming subcooled liquid. Two unstable flow boiling regimes, with long-period oscillation (more than 1 s) and short-period oscillation (less than 0.1 s) in temperature and pressure, were identified. The former was due to the expansion of vapor bubble from downstream while the latter was owing to the flow pattern transition from annular to mist flow. A comparison of results of flow boiling in parallel microchannels and in a single microchannel shows that flow interaction effects from neighboring channels at the headers are significant. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据