4.4 Article

Differences in inflammatory pain in nNOS-, iNOS- and eNOS-deficient mice

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 810-818

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2006.12.008

关键词

hyperalgesia; allodynia; behavioural testing; nitric oxide synthase; knockout; calcitonin gene related peptide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To assess the relative importance of the isoforms of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) in inflammatory pain, we directly compared pain behaviour and paw thickness after intraplantar injection of complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) in wild-type (WT) mice and in mice lacking either inducible (iNOS), endothelial (eNOS) or neuronal NOS (nNOS). In mice deficient for nNOS, thermal hyperalgesia was reduced by approximately 50% compared to wild type mice at 4 and 8 It after CFA injection, and mechanical hypersensitivity was absent. The only change in pain behaviour in iNOS and eNOS deficient mice compared to WT mice was a more rapid recovery from thermal hyperalgesia. A compensatory up-regulation of nNOS in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and spinal cords of iNOS and eNOS knockout mice was excluded using RT-PCR. However, an increase of iNOS gene expression was found in spinal cords of eNOS and nNOS deficient mice. To study the downstream effects of nNOS deficiency on DRG neurones, we assessed their immunoreactivity for calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and cytokines. We found a significant reduction in the CFA induced increase in CGRP inummoreactive neurotics as well as in CGRP gene expression in nNOS deficient mice, whereas the percentage of cells immunopositive for tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta) was unchanged. These results support the proposed role of nNOS in sensitization of DRG neurones, and might indicate that CGRP is involved in this process. (c) 2007 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Federation of Chapters of the International Association for the Study of Pain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据