4.4 Article

Evaluation of internal consistency and re-test reliability of Bath ankylosing spondylitis indices in a large cohort of adult and juvenile spondylitis patients in Taiwan

期刊

CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 26, 期 10, 页码 1685-1691

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-007-0573-6

关键词

Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index; Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global Score; reliability; validity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global Score (BAS-G) have been recommended for evaluating function and disability in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The aim of this study was to develop a Chinese version of the BASDAI, BASFI, and BAS-G and assess their reliability and validity. The Chinese version was obtained after a translation and back-translation process. A total of 447 patients with adult and juvenile AS were assessed using these three instruments. Reliability was tested by internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Internal consistency of the instrument was given as Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient. To assess the sensitivity to change, 153 patients were included in an 8-week follow-up study. In our analysis, the reliability of these three instruments-the BASDAI, BASFI, and BAS-G-for a 24-h test-retest showed acceptable intraclass correlation coefficients (0.92-0.94). Our Chinese versions of the BASDAI, BASFI, and BAS-G also showed 0.87, 0.94, and 0.90, respectively, with Cronbach's alpha coefficient, indicating good reliability. For sensitivity to change in 8-week follow-up, all three instruments showed 5.0 to 5.4% changes. Our Chinese versions of the BASDAI, BASFI, and BAS-G showed adequate reliability, validity, and responsiveness to clinical change. Thus, disease activity and functional status in Chinese-speaking patients with AS may be adequately evaluated with these versions of the original instruments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据