4.5 Review

T cell immune reconstitution following lymphodepletion

期刊

SEMINARS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 19, 期 5, 页码 318-330

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.smim.2007.10.004

关键词

immune reconstitution; lymphopenia; thymopoiesis; thymus; homeostatic peripheral expansion; GVHD; immunotherapy

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z99 CA999999, Z01 BC010525-04] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

T cell reconstitution following lymphopenia from chemotherapy or stem cell transplant is often slow and incompetent, contributing to the development of infectious diseases, relapse, and graft-versus-host disease. This is due to the fact that de novo T cell production is impaired following cytoreductive regimens. T cells can be generated from two pathways: (1) thymus derived through active thymopoiesis and (2) peripherally expanded clones through homeostatic proliferation. During recovery from lymphopenia, the thymic pathway is commonly compromised in adults and T cells rely upon peripheral expansion to restore T cell numbers. This homeostatic proliferation exploits the high cytokine levels following lymphopenia to rapidly generate T cells in the periphery. Moreover, this early peripheral expansion of T cells can also be driven by exogenous antigen. This results in loss of T cell repertoire diversity and may predispose to auto- or allo-immunity. Alternatively, the high homeostatic proliferation following lymphopenia may facilitate expansion of anti-tumor immunity. Murine and human studies have provided insight into the cytokine and cellular regulators of these two pathways of T cell generation and the disparate portraits of T cell immunity created through robust thymopoiesis or peripheral expansion following lymphopenia. This insight has permitted the manipulation of the immune system to maximize anti-tumor immunity through lymphopenia and led to an appreciation of mechanisms that underlie graft versus host disease. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据