4.5 Article

CSSP2: An improved method for predicting contact-dependent secondary structure propensity

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
卷 31, 期 5-6, 页码 373-377

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2007.06.002

关键词

amyloid fibril formation; secondary structure prediction; machine learning; artificial neural network; energy decomposition

资金

  1. NLM NIH HHS [2G08LM06230-03A1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2005-003-C00158] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The calculation of contact-dependent secondary structure propensity (CSSP) has been reported to sensitively detect non-native beta-strand propensities in the core sequences of amyloidogenic proteins. Here we describe a noble energy-based CSSP method implemented on dual artificial neural networks that rapidly and accurately estimate the potential for the non-native secondary structure formation in local regions of protein sequences. In this method, we attempted to quantify long-range interaction patterns in diverse secondary structures by potential energy calculations and decomposition on a pairwise per-residue basis. The calculated energy parameters and seven-residue sequence information were used as inputs for artificial neural networks (ANN's) to predict sequence potential for secondary structure conversion. The trained single ANN using the >(i, i +/- 4) interaction energy parameter exhibited 74% accuracy in predicting the secondary structure of test sequences in their native energy state, while the dual ANN-based predictor using (i, i +/- 4) and >(i, i +/- 4) interaction energies showed 83% prediction accuracy. The present method provides a simple and accurate tool for predicting sequence potential for secondary structure conversions without using 3D structural information. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据