4.6 Article

Diagnostic accuracy of MALDI mass spectrometric analysis of unfractionated serum in lung cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY
卷 2, 期 10, 页码 893-901

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31814b8be7

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCATS NIH HHS [UL1 TR000005] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCI NIH HHS [P50 CA090440, P50 CA90440, P50 CA090949-07, P50 CA090949, P30 CA068485, U01 CA114771-04, 5R33CA86243, P50 CA90949, U01 CA114771, R33 CA086243] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: There is a critical need for improvements in the noninvasive diagnosis of lung cancer. We hypothesized that matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI MS) analysis of the most abundant peptides in the serum may distinguish lung cancer cases from matched controls. Patients and Methods: We used MALDI MS to analyze unfractionated serum from a total of 288 cases and matched controls split into training (n = 182) and test sets (n = 106). We used a training-testing paradigm with application of the model profile defined in a training set to a blinded test cohort. Results: Reproducibility and lack of analytical bias was confinned in quality-control studies. A serum proteomic signature of seven features in the training set reached an overall accuracy of 78%, a sensitivity of 67.4%, and a specificity of 88.9%. In the blinded test set, this signature reached an overall accuracy of 72.6%, a sensitivity of 58%, and a specificity of 85.7%. The serum signature was associated with the diagnosis of lung cancer independently of gender, smoking status, smoking pack-years, and C-reactive protein levels. From this signature, we identified three discriminatory features as members of a cluster of truncated forms of serum amyloid A. Conclusions: We found a serum proteomic profile that discriminates lung cancer from matched controls. Proteomic analysis of unfractionated serum may have a role in the noninvasive diagnosis of lung cancer and will require methodological refinements and prospective validation to achieve clinical utility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据