4.7 Article

Induction of mitochondrial biogenesis is a maladaptive mechanism in mitochondrial cardiomyopathies

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 50, 期 14, 页码 1362-1369

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.035

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives The purpose of this study was to clarify the molecular mechanisms linking human mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid (mtDNA) dysfunction to cardiac remodeling. Background Defects of the mitochondrial genome cause a heterogeneous group of clinical disorders, including mitochondrial cardiomyopathies (MIC). The molecular events linking mtDNA defects to cardiac remodeling are unknown. Energy derangements and increase of mitochondrial-derived reactive oxygen species (ROS) could both play a role in the development of cardiac dysfunction in MIC. In addition, mitochondrial proliferation could interfere with sarcomere alignment and contraction. Methods We performed a detailed morphologic and molecular analysis on failing hearts from 3 patients with MIC, failing human hearts due to ischemic heart disease (IHD) or dilated cardiomyopathies (DCM), and nonfailing hearts. Results The MIC hearts showed marked mitochondrial proliferation with myofibril displacement. Consistent with morphologic features, increase in mtDNA content per cell and induction of genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis, fatty acid metabolism, and glucose transport were observed. Down-regulation of these genes characterized DCM and IHD hearts. A pronounced increase in mitochondrial-derived ROS was observed in MIC hearts compared with failing hearts due to other causes. This was paralleled by up-regulation of genes encoding for uncoupling proteins and antioxidant enzymes. However, there was not a significant increase in antioxidant enzyme activity. Conclusions Our results suggest that besides energy deficiency, mitochondrial biogenesis per se is a maladaptive response in MIC and, possibly, in other metabolic cardiomyopathies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据