4.7 Review

Supplementary motor area and presupplementary motor area: Targets of basal ganglia and cerebellar output

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 27, 期 40, 页码 10659-10673

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3134-07.2007

关键词

virus tracing; cortical motor areas; motor control; Parkinson's disease; dentate; globus pallidus

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P40 RR018604] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIH HHS [P40 OD010996] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [MH56661, R01 MH056661] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [NS24328, R01 NS024328] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We used retrograde transneuronal transport of neurotropic viruses in Cebus monkeys to examine the organization of basal ganglia and cerebellar projections to two cortical areas on the medial wall of the hemisphere, the supplementary motor area ( SMA) and the pre-SMA. We found that both of these cortical areas are the targets of disynaptic projections from the dentate nucleus of the cerebellum and from the internal segment of the globus pallidus ( GPi). On average, the number of pallidal neurons that project to the SMA and pre-SMA is approximately three to four times greater than the number of dentate neurons that project to these cortical areas. GPi neurons that project to the pre-SMA are located in a rostral, associative territory of the nucleus, whereas GPi neurons that project to the SMA are located in a more caudal and ventral sensorimotor territory. Similarly, dentate neurons that project to the pre-SMA are located in a ventral, nonmotor domain of the nucleus, whereas dentate neurons that project to the SMA are located in a more dorsal, motor domain. The differential origin of subcortical projections to the SMA and pre-SMA suggests that these cortical areas are nodes in distinct neural systems. Although both systems are the target of outputs from the basal ganglia and the cerebellum, these two cortical areas seem to be dominated by basal ganglia input.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据