4.8 Article

An epipodite-bearing crown-group crustacean from the Lower Cambrian

期刊

NATURE
卷 449, 期 7162, 页码 595-598

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature06138

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crown-group crustaceans (Eucrustacea) are common in the fossil record of the past 500 million years back to the early Ordovician period, and very rare representatives are also known from the late Middle and Late Cambrian periods(1). Finds in Lower Cambrian rocks of the Phosphatocopina, the fossil sister group to eucrustaceans(2), imply that members of the eucrustacean stem lineage co-occurred, but it remained unclear whether crown-group members were also present at that time. 'Orsten'-type fossils are typically tiny embryos and cuticle-bearing animals, of which the cuticle is phosphatized and the material is three-dimensional and complete with soft parts. Such fossils are found predominantly in the Cambrian and Ordovician and provide detailed morphological and phylogenetic information on the early evolution of metazoans. Here we report an Orsten-type Konservat-Lagerstatte from the Lower Cambrian of China that contains at least three new arthropod species, of which we describe the most abundant form on the basis of exceptionally well preserved material of several growth stages. The limb morphology and other details of this new species are markedly similar to those of living cephalocarids, branchiopods and copepods and it is assigned to the Eucrustacea, thus representing the first undoubted crown-group crustacean from the early Cambrian. Its stratigraphical position provides substantial support to the proposition that the main cladogenic event that gave rise to the Arthropoda was before the Cambrian(3). Small leaf-shaped structures on the outer limb base of the new species provide evidence on the long-debated issue of the origin of epipodites(4,5): they occur in a set of three, derive from setae and are a ground-pattern feature of Eucrustacea.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据