4.7 Article

Tissue microarray analysis of connexin expression and its prognostic significance in human breast cancer

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 255, 期 2, 页码 284-294

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.05.001

关键词

breast cancer; connexin; gap junctions; tissue microarrays

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Breast cancer accounts for approximately 15% of all cancer deaths. Currently, axillary nodal status is the most reliable prognostic indicator for breast cancer. Tumor size and histological grade are used to stage breast cancer. Estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) and HER-2/neu status are useful in predicting patient survival and relapse. Ki67, an indicator of proliferative activity, also correlates well with prognosis. Connexin proteins form gap junction channels, permitting intercellular exchange of ions and small molecules. Reduced connexin protein levels and impaired gap junctional intercellular communication are associated with tumor phenotypes. This study investigated the prognostic value of connexin proteins as breast cancer markers. Tissue microarrays, containing 438 cases of invasive breast carcinoma, were stained with Cx26, Cx32. and Cx43 antibodies. The degree of connexin immunoreactivity was determined and then correlated with patient outcome, tumor grade, tumor size, lymph node status, and immunohistochemical markers, such as p53, ER/PR status. Ki67 and c-erbB-2 expression. Cx26, Cx32, or Cx43 did not correlate well with tumor grade, tumor size, p53 or c-erbB-2 status. There was an inverse correlation between Cx32 and lymph node status (P < 0.05) and a positive correlation between Cx43 and PR Status (P < 0.01). Cx32 and Cx43 correlated positively with ER status (P < 0.01). Cx43 correlated negatively with Ki67 expression (P < 0.01). Cx26, Cx32, and Cx43 did not correlate with patient outcome. Based on our observations in this Study, connexin proteins do not appear to be reliable indicators of breast cancer prognosis. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据