4.7 Article

The significance of medial temporal lobe atrophy

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 69, 期 15, 页码 1521-1527

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000277459.83543.99

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G0502157, G0400074, G0500247] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. MRC [G0500247, G0400074, G0502157] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [G0500247, G0502157, G0400074] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Medial temporal lobe atrophy ( MTA) is a sensitive radiologic marker for Alzheimer disease ( AD) and associated with cognitive impairment. The value of MTA in the oldest old ( > 85 years old) is largely unknown. Methods: A total of 132 formalin-fixed brains from the Vantaa 85 + community-based study were subjected to postmortem MRI. Visual ratings of MTA were determined in a blinded fashion and compared with neuropathologic findings and clinical assessment ( dementia according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-III-R). Results: A strong relationship was found between MTA scores and Alzheimer pathology ( p < 0.001). The previously proposed cutoff MTA score > 2 correctly excluded subjects with no or borderline Alzheimer-type pathology ( 45/48), but was not very sensitive for AD ( modified National Institute on Aging-Reagan Institute criteria). MTA scores > 2 were also found in subjects with other primary neurodegenerative hippocampal pathology including hippocampal sclerosis, Lewy-related pathology, and argyrophilic grain disease, either alone or in combination with Alzheimer-type pathology. High MTA scores were associated with clinical dementia-in this subgroup, sensitivity was 63% and specificity 69% for AD. Conclusion: Medial temporal lobe atrophy ( MTA) on postmortem MRI is sensitive to primary degenerative hippocampal pathology in the very old, but not specific for Alzheimer-type pathology. MTA scores of 2 or less are not frequently associated with dementia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据