4.5 Review

Glutamate receptor subunit expression in the rhesus macaque locus coeruleus

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1173, 期 -, 页码 53-65

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.08.007

关键词

locus coeruleus; microarray; gene array; rhesus macaque; glutamate receptor; in situ hybridization

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [K01 RR000163, P51 RR000163, RR-00163, P51 RR000163-478883] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [HD-29186, R01 HD029186-09, R01 HD029186] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thelocus coeruleus (LC) is a major noradrenergic brain nucleus that regulates states of arousal, optimizes task-oriented decision making, and may also play an important role in modulating the activity of the reproductive neuroendocrine axis. Rodent studies have shown that the LC is responsive to glutamate receptor agonists, and that it expresses various glutamate receptor subunits. However, glutamate receptor subunit expression has not been extensively examined in the primate LC. We previously demonstrated expression of the NR1 NMDA glutamate receptor subunit in the rhesus macaque LC and now extend this work by also examining the expression of non-NMDA (AMPA and kainate) ionotropic glutamate receptor subunits. Using in situ hybridization histochemistry and immunohistochemistry, we confirmed the presence of the obligatory NR1 subunit in the LC, In addition, we demonstrated expression of the AMPA glutamate receptor subunits GluR1, GluR2, and GluR3. More extensive receptor profiling, using rhesus monkey gene microarrays (Affymetrix GeneChip (R)), further corroborated the histological findings and showed expression of mRNA encoding ionotropic glutamate receptor subunits NR2A, NR2D, GluR4, and GluR6, as well as the metabotropic glutamate receptor subunits mGluR1, mGluR3, mGluR4, mGluR5, and mGluR7. These data provide a foundation for future examination of how changes in glutamate receptor composition contribute to the control of primate physiology. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据