4.7 Article

The hot interstellar medium of normal elliptical galaxies.: I.: A Chandra gas gallery and comparison of X-ray and optical morphology

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 668, 期 1, 页码 150-167

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/521009

关键词

cooling flows; galaxies : elliptical and lenticular, cD; galaxies : ISM; X-rays : galaxies; X-rays : ISM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present an X-ray analysis of 54 normal elliptical galaxies in the Chandra archive and isolate their hot gas component from the contaminating point-source emission, allowing us to conduct, for the first time, a morphological analysis on the gas alone. A comparison with optical images and photometry shows that the hot gas morphology has surprisingly little in common with the shape of the stellar distribution. We observe no correlation between optical and X-ray ellipticities in the inner regions where stellar mass dominates over dark matter. A shallow correlation would be expected if the gas had settled into hydrostatic equilibrium with the gravitational potential. Instead, observed X-ray ellipticities exceed optical ellipticities in many cases. We exclude rotation as the dominant factor to produce the gas ellipticities. The gas appears disturbed, and hydrostatic equilibrium is the exception rather than the rule. Nearly all hydrostatic models can be ruled out at 99% confidence, based on their inability to reproduce the optical-X-ray correlation and large X-ray ellipticities. Hydrostatic models not excluded are those in which dark matter either dominates over stellar mass inside the inner half-light radius or has a prominently cigar-shaped distribution, both of which can be ruled out on other grounds. We conclude that, even for rather X-ray-faint elliptical galaxies, the gas is at least so far out of equilibrium that it does not retain any information about the shape of the potential, and that X-ray-derived radial mass profiles may be in error by factors of order unity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据