4.5 Article

Consequences of intraspecific variation for the structure and function of ecological communities Part 1. Model development and predicted patterns of diversity

期刊

ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
卷 207, 期 2-4, 页码 264-276

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.05.004

关键词

individual-based modelling; ecosystem dynamics; community dynamics; biodiversity; trait-based modelling; trait trade-offs; intraspecific variation; interspecific variation; community structure; abundance distribution

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biodiversity is generally accepted to include both within species and between species variation. Consequently, the contribution to the functioning of ecosystems of variation among individuals should be accounted for. However, very little is known about patterns of diversity below the species level, and less still about the patterns of individual diversity and their relation to ecosystem context and community function. We present a model for the dynamics of individuals that is physiologically based and spatially explicit. Individuals are defined in terms of measurable parameters that relate environmental context to phenotype and in this sense define the genotype. Estimates for the variation in the parameter values are obtained from experiments conducted on the species Rumex acetosa. Simulations are performed to predict the form of the relative abundance distribution, and the dependence of the predicted number of coexisting genotypes on patch area (the genotype-area curve). We find that the predicted forms of the abundance distribution and genotype-area curve are indistinguishable from those measured at the species level. Furthermore, we identify the importance of physiological trade-offs at the individual level in promoting diversity and the sensitivity of genotype richness to the degree of similarity of individuals in the community. The extension of the model to include inter-species variation is discussed. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据