4.7 Article

Outflow and dense gas emission from massive infrared dark clouds

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 668, 期 1, 页码 348-358

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/521142

关键词

ISM : abundances; ISM : clouds; ISM : jets and outflows; ISM : kinematics and dynamics; stars : early-type; stars : formation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Infrared dark clouds are expected to harbor sources in different, very young evolutionary stages. To better characterize these differences, we observed a sample of 43 massive infrared dark clouds, originally selected as candidate high-mass starless cores, with the IRAM 30 m telescope covering spectral line tracers of low-density gas, high-density gas, molecular outflows/jets and temperature effects. The SiO(2-1) observations reveal detections toward 18 sources. Assuming that SiO is exclusively produced by sputtering from dust grains, this implies that at least in 40% of this sample star formation is ongoing. A broad range of SiO line widths is observed (between 2.2 and 65 km s(-1)), and we discuss potential origins for this velocity spread. While the low-density tracers (CO)-C-12(2-1) and (CO)-C-13(1-0) are detected in several velocity components, the high-density tracer (HCO+)-C-13(1-0) generally shows only a single velocity component and is hence well suited for kinematic distance estimates of IRDCs. Furthermore, the (HCO+)-C-13 line width is on average 1.5 times larger than that of previously observed NH3(1, 1). This is indicative of more motion at the denser core centers, due to either turbulence or beginning star formation activity. In addition, we detect CH3CN toward only six sources, whereas CH3OH is observed toward approximately 40% of the sample. Estimates of the CH3CN and CH3OH abundances are low with average values of 1: 2; 10(-10) and 4: 3; 10(-10), respectively. These results are consistent with chemical models at the earliest evolutionary stages of high-mass star formation. Furthermore, the CH3OH abundances compare well to recently reported values for low-mass starless cores.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据