4.7 Article

Effective clarification of apple juice using membrane filtration without enzyme and pasteurization pretreatment

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 57, 期 2, 页码 366-373

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2007.04.025

关键词

clarification; apple juice; ultrafiltration; pretreatment; polyethersuphone

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the feasibility of clarifying apple juice using membrane filtration without enzyme-hydrolysis and pasteurization pretreatment was investigated extensively. It was found that the enzymatic and pasteurization pretreatment of apple juice had profound influence on the permeate flux and membrane fouling. The enzyme hydrolysis of the apple juice resulted in higher flux. The pasteurization of the apple juice without enzyme pretreatment caused lower flux possibly due to gelatinization at the membrane surface caused b, cross-linking between deposited pectin and starch molecules. The permeate flux increased initially with the transmembrane pressure (TMP) and then kept at a plateau as TMP >2.0 bar. Generally, the permeate flux increased with the increase of cross-flow velocity (CFV). The increase of operation temperature from 23 to 50 degrees C also improved the permeate flux. In the long-term in situ tests without enzymatic pretreatment, the mean flux was higher than 120 l/M-2 It (LMH), and high VCF (volume concentration factor, >20) was achieved. The very stable and high flux kept over 20 hours' industrial simulating tests also indicated that membrane fouling to the filtration performance could be neglected and the major factors influencing permeate flux were the feed concentration and viscosity. The clarified juice has very good quality in NTU, transmittance and color, and no starch, pectin and thermo-acidophilic bacteria (TAB) were detected in the clarified juice. Based on the pilot tests, a new full-scale membrane plant was designed for an apple juice producer and compared with its industrially used tubular membrane system. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据