4.1 Article

Anaerobic bacteria and antibiotics: What kind of unexpected resistance could I find in my laboratory tomorrow?

期刊

ANAEROBE
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 555-559

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.10.002

关键词

Antibiotic resistance; Anaerobic bacteria; cepA gene; Nim gene; Van gene

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this article is to set out some important considerations on the main emerging antibiotic resistance patterns among anaerobic bacteria. The first point concerns the Bacteroides fragilis group and its resistance to the combination of beta-lactam + beta-lactamase inhibitor. When there is overproduction of cephalosporinase, it results in increased resistance to the beta-lactams while maintaining susceptibility to beta-lactams/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations. However, if another resistance mechanism is added, such as a loss of porin, resistances to beta-lactam + beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations may occur. The second point is resistance to metronidazole occurring due to nim genes. PCR detection of nim genes alone is not sufficient for predicting resistance to metronidazole; actual MIC determinations are required. Therefore, it can be assumed that other resistance mechanisms can also be involved. Although metronidazole resistance remains rare for the B. fragilis group, it has nevertheless been detected worldwide and also been observed spreading to other species. In some cases where there is only a decreased susceptibility, clinical failures may occur. The last point concerns resistance of Clostridium species to glycopeptides and lipopeptides. Low levels of resistance have been detected with these antibiotics. Van genes have been detected not only in clostridia but also in other species. In conclusion, antibiotic resistance involves different mechanisms and affects many anaerobic species and is spreading worldwide. This demonstrates the need to continue with antibiotic resistance testing and surveys in anaerobic bacteria. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据