4.5 Article

Mono- and double-mutant mouse models of Parkinson's!disease display severe mitochondrial damage

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 16, 期 20, 页码 2377-2393

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddm083

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations in the gene encoding alpha-synuclein (asyn) causes autosomal-dominant, in the parkin gene autosomal-recessive forms of Parkinson's disease (PD). The pathophysiology of PD is poorly understood, even though published evidence suggests a role for mitochondria in the pathogenesis. To gain insight into the influence of asyn and parkin on mitochondrial integrity and function, we have generated several mono-mutant mouse lines expressing doubly mutated human asyn (hm(2) asyn) under the control of two different promoters, or a targeted deletion of Parkin (Parkin-Exon3-knockout). Both mouse lines were crossed to generate the double-mutant. Here we compare the ultrastructure and functional properties of mitochondria in the substantia nigra (SN), the striatum, the cerebral cortex (Cx) and skeletal muscle of young (2-3 months) and aged (12-14 months) mono- and double-mutants mice. We observed severe genotype-, age- and region-dependent morphological alterations of mitochondria in neuronal somata. The number of structurally altered mitochondria was significantly increased in the SN of both double-mutants and in the Cx of one mono- and one double-mutant line. These alterations coincided with a reduced complex I capacity in the SN, but were neither accompanied by alterations in the number or the size of the mitochondria nor by leakage of cytochrome c, Smac/DIABLO or Omi/HtrA2. None of the transgenic animals developed any gross histopathological abnormalities or overt motor disabilities. Together our results provide compelling evidence that (i) both, asyn and parkin are relevant for mitochondrial integrity, (ii) the influence of these proteins on mitochondria are age- and tissue-specific and (iii) changes of mitochondrial morphology do not inevitably cause functional impairments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据