4.7 Article

Intraburst and interburst signaling by climbing fibers

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 27, 期 42, 页码 11263-11270

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2559-07.2007

关键词

inferior olive; cerebellum; afterdepolarization; model; Purkinje neurons; complex spike

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS-13742, P01 NS013742] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although cerebellar Purkinje cell complex spikes occur at low frequency (similar to 1/s), each complex spike is often associated with a high-frequency burst (similar to 500/s) of climbing fiber spikes. We examined the possibility that signals are present within the climbing fiber bursts. By intracellularly recording from depolarized, nonspiking Purkinje cells in anesthetized pigmented rabbits, climbing fiber burst patterns were investigated by determining the number of components in the induced compound EPSPs during spontaneous activity and during visual stimulation. For our sample of 43 cells, > 70% of all EPSPs were of the compound type composed of two or three EPSPs. During spontaneous activity, the number of components in each compound EPSP was not related to the latency to the succeeding compound EPSP. Conversely, the number of components in each compound EPSP was related to its latency after the preceding compound EPSP. This latency increased from 0.62s for one-component EPSPs to 1.69 s for compound EPSPs with four or more components. The effect of visual stimulation on the climbing fiber activity was studied in 19 floccular Purkinje cells whose low-frequency interburst climbing fiber response was modulated by movement about the vertical axis. During sinusoidal oscillation (0.1 Hz, +/- 10 degrees), compound EPSPs with a larger number of components tended to be more prevalent during movement in the excitatory direction than in the inhibitory direction. Thus, climbing fibers can, in addition to modulation of their low interburst frequency, transmit signals in the form of the number of spikes within each high-frequency burst.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据