4.4 Article

Thermodynamic dissection of the ezrin FERM/CERMAD interface

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 46, 期 43, 页码 12174-12189

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi701281e

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ERM (Ezrin-Radixin-Moesin) proteins are key cross-linkers of the plasma membrane and the actin cytoskeleton. They are regulated by the intramolecular association of the N-terminal FERM (band-four point one, Ezrin, Radixin, Moesin) and C-terminal CERMAD (ERM association domain) domains (N/C interaction), which masks the binding surfaces of the domains for other molecules. The N/C interface is characterized by the highly distributed binding of CERMAD through a P-strand and four (x-helices to a globular FERM. Though it is a target for multiple regulatory signals, little is known about the dynamics/thermodynamics governing this interface. Recent implications of Ezrin in cancer metastasis have increased the necessity to understand this regulatory switch. In this study, we report residue-specific stabilities of Ezrin CERMAD at the Ezrin N/C interface obtained using hydrogen-deuterium exchange NMR. These stabilities vary across secondary structural elements and identify F583 and L586 as key anchor residues for the most stable element, oLD. Macroscopic N/C binding, energetics, obtained using isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) reveals a high affinity (K-d =176 nM) enthalpy-driven binding (Delta H = -26 kcal/mol, T Delta S = -17 kcal/mol) at 25 degrees C at pH 7 in MES and phosphate buffers. Delta 10-fold increase in affinity was observed for measurements in acetate buffer, suggesting that an acetate-like molecule might promote the repressed form of the complex, possibly through interaction with the F2 subdomain of FERM, which resembles the acyl-CoA binding protein. In summary, our results have illustrated the dynamic nature of this regulatory interface and provide a foundation for investigating the role of regulatory signals on the stability of this interface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据