4.7 Article

Effect of styryl side groups on the photophysical properties and hole mobility of PPE-PPV systems

期刊

MACROMOLECULES
卷 40, 期 22, 页码 7786-7794

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ma071676i

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This contribution reports on the synthesis of defect-free styryl-substituted poly(p-phenyleneethynylene)-alt-poly(p-phenylene-vinylene)s, DO- and MEH-ST-PPE2-PPV2, consisting of a 2:2 triple bond/double bond ratio in the main chain. A detailed and systematic comparison of their photophysical properties with those of solely alkoxy-substituted polymer O-8-PPE2-PPV2, highlighting the effect of the styryl side groups, has been carried out. The bis(styryl) substituents act on the one hand as electron donor to the main chain conjugation L system and, on the other hand, form a separate bis(styryl)phenylene chromophore system. The resulting two-dimensional and separate conjugation construct in ST-PPE-PPV polymers is confirmed by the fluorescence excitation anisotropy curves, which reach the value 0 around 360 nm corresponding to the absorption of the bis(styryl) system. Thin film PL and EL spectra of MEH-ST-PPE2-PPV2 are red-shifted relative to DO-ST-PPE2-PPV2, due to strong pi T interchain interactions resulting from the grafting of methoxy side groups, potentially explaining the better EL performance of MEH- than DO-ST-PPE2-PPV2 LED device (glass substrate/ ITO/PEDOT:PSS/ST-PPE2-PPV2/Ca/Ag) as well as the higher intrinsic hole mobility value, mu hole (measured using CELIV technique) for MEH- (2.8 x 10(-6) cm(2)/V center dot s) than DO-ST-PPE2-PPV2 (1.5 x 10(-6) cm(2)/V center dot s). Both values are, however, at least 2-fold lower than that of O-8-PPE2-PPV2 (5.5 x 10(-6) cm(2)/N center dot s) due to the twist in their conjugated backbone caused by the styryl side groups. Nevertheless, nonoptimized bulk heterojunction solar cells Of eta(AM1.5) around 1% were readily designed using MEH-ST-PPE2-PPV2 as donor and PCBM as acceptor in a 1:3 weight ratio.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据