4.8 Article

Carbon nanotube/polysulfone screen-printed electrochemical immunosensor

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 332-340

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2007.04.021

关键词

polysulfone; immunosensor; amperometric biosensor; carbon nanotubes; composite; biocomposite; screen-printed electrode

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The simple and efficient method for preparing sensitive carbon nanotube/polysulfone/RIgG immunocomposite is described. The membrane of the modified disposable screen-printed electrochemical immunosensor is based on phase inversion method. Carbon nanotube/polysulfone membrane acts both as reservoir of immunological material and transducer while offering high surface area, high toughness and mechanical flexibility. The comparison with graphite/polysulfone/RIgG immunosensors shows a much higher sensitivity for those prepared with carbon nanotubes coupled with polysulfone (PSf). The membrane was characterized by scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray analysis (SEM/EDX), laser profilometer and by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The purity of the materials was evaluated by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The roughness value is doubled when MWCNTs are used instead of graphite into the PSf membranes and the incorporation of antibodies enhances the dispersion of the carbon with the polymeric membrane reducing the roughness in all cases. This biosensor was based on the competitive assay between free and labelled anti-RIgG for the available binding sites of immobilized rabbit IgG (RIgG). The RIgG was incorporated into the polysulfone membrane by a phase inversion method. Horse radish peroxidase (HRP) enzyme was used as label and hydroquinone as mediator. The detection limit for competitive assay was determined to be 1.66 mu g/ml. the linear range of anti-RIgG from 2 to 5 mu g/ml and the C-50 was found at 3.56 mu g/ml. The sensitivity is five times higher for MWCNT than for graphite electrodes, showing lower unspecific adsorption. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据