3.8 Article

Online assessment of ALS functional rating scale compares well to in-clinic evaluation: A prospective trial

期刊

AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 210-216

出版社

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/17482968.2011.633268

关键词

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; ALS Functional Rating Scale; ALSFRS-R; online self-assessment; patient reported outcomes

资金

  1. Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
  3. AirBerlin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Self-assessment of symptom progression in chronic diseases is of increasing importance in clinical research, patient management and specialized outpatient care. Against this background, we developed a secure internet platform (ALShome. de) that allows online assessment of the revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) and other established self-assessment questionnaires. We developed a secure and closed internet portal to assess patient reported outcomes. In a prospective, controlled and stratified study, patients conducted a web-based self-assessment of ALSFRS-R compared to on-site assessment. On-site and online assessments were compared at baseline (n = 127) and after 3.5 months (n = 81, 64%). Results showed that correlation between on-site evaluation and online testing of ALSFRS-R was highly significant (r = 0.96; p < 0.001). The agreement of both capturing methods (online vs. on-site) was excellent (mean interval, 8.8 days). The adherence to online rating was high; 75% of patients tested on-site completed a follow-up online visit (mean 3.5 months, SD 1.7). We conclude that online self-assessment of ALS severity complements the well-established face-to-face application of the ALSFRS-R during on-site visits. The results of our study support the use of online administration of ALSFRS-R within clinical trials and for managing the care of ALS patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据