4.3 Article

Enhancing performance of liquid sample desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry using trap and capillary columns

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2015.09.010

关键词

Mass spectrometry; Desorption electrospray ionization; Desalting and enrichment; Online enzyme digestion; Phosphoprotein

资金

  1. NSF [CHE-1149367, CHE-1455554]
  2. NNSFC [21328502]
  3. National Institutes of Health [R01GM103479]
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1455554] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Chemistry [1149367] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (DESI-MS) is a recent and important advance in the field that has extensive applications in surface analysis of solid samples but has also been extended to analysis of liquid samples. The liquid sample DESI typically employs a piece of fused silica capillary to transfer liquid sample for ionization. In this study, we present the improvement of liquid sample DESI-MS by replacing the sample transfer silica capillary with a trap column filled with chromatographic stationary phase materials (e.g., C4, C18). This type of trap column/liquid sample DESI can be used for trace analysis of organics and biomolecules such as proteins/peptides (in nM concentration) in high salt content matrices. Furthermore, when the sample transfer capillary is modified with enzyme covalently bound on its inside capillary wall, fast digestion (<6 min) of proteins such as phosphoproteins can be achieved and the online digested proteins can be directly ionized using DESI with high sensitivity. The latter is ascribed to the freedom to select favorable spray solvent for the DESI analysis. Our data show that liquid sample DESI-MS with a modified sample transfer capillary has significantly expanded utility in bioanalysis. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据