4.5 Article

Sustained improvement of health-related quality of life in Crohn's disease patients treated with infliximab and azathioprine for 4 years

期刊

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 1395-1400

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1002/ibd.20205

关键词

quality of life; Crohn's disease; clinical activity; health status; long-term infliximab

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Infliximab induces remission and improves the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients with refractory or fistulous Crohn's disease (CD). However, little information is available as to whether its effect on HRQOL is sustained over time. The objective was to measure the HRQOL of CD patients in long-term clinical remission. Methods: Prospective, observational study was undertaken in patients with CD in infliximab-induced clinical remission (Harvey index <3) for at least 6 months, and receiving long-term infliximab and azathioprine maintenance therapy. Patients were followed for 4 years or until clinical relapse (Harvey index >3). HRQOL was assessed annually using the validated Spanish version of the disease-specific 36-item Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ-36) and the EuroQol-5D. Results: Forty-nine patients with CD in stable clinical remission were included at baseline. At 12 months, n = 42 patients remained in remission, at 24 months n = 32 patients, at 36 months n = 13, and in the last visit at 48 months 6 patients remained in clinical remission. The overall score on the IBDQ-36 remained unchanged in patients with stable, inactive CD (median overall score of 6.1 at baseline and 6.5 at 4 years). Scores on all 5 dimensions of the IBDQ-36 remained unchanged over the study period in stable patients. Patients in remission scored highly on the preference value ratings of the EuroQol-5D (scores of 1.0) and remained unchanged in patients who remained in remission. Conclusions: Sustained clinical remission of CD achieved with maintenance treatment maintains HRQOL over long-term follow-up.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据