4.7 Article

The neuropsychological effects of chronic methylphenidate on drug-naive boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 62, 期 9, 页码 954-962

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.12.030

关键词

attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; cognition; executive functioning; methylphenidate; randomized controlled trial; stimulant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The reported neuropsychological effects of methylphenidate (MPH) in attention-cleficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are inconsistent. The assumed relationships between these neuropsychological effects and clinical efficacy have not been substantiated. We therefore investigated the effects of chronic MPH administration on neuropsychological functioning. Methods: We conducted a 12-week, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, randomized, crossover trial (MPH .3 and .6 mg/kg/dose and placebo). Participants were 75 boys aged 7-15 years with ADHD. Neuropsychological performance was assessed with tests taken from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) battery and a GoNoGo task. Results: Chronic MPH improved performance (p <.001) on aspects of the GoNoGo task (p <.02) and on three CANTAB tasks which together contributed to a recognition memory component identified through principal components analysis (delayed matching to sample [DMtS], pattern and spatial recognition). There were no effects on other, high or low executive demand tasks (p >.05). GoNoGo performance improvements were the only neuropsychopharmacological changes associated with clinical response. Poor performance on the DMtS task was the sole baseline neuropsychological predictor of clinical response. Conclusions: Chronic MPH predominantly enhanced neuropsychological functioning on recognition memory component tasks with modest executive demands. Neuropsychological measures offer only modest contributions to the prediction of clinical responses to MPH in ADHD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据