4.6 Article

Employment after traumatic brain injury: Differences between men and women

期刊

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.006

关键词

brain injuries; employment; rehabilitation; sex

资金

  1. PHS HHS [U17/CCU421926] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Corrigan JD, Lineberry LA, Komaroff E, Langlois JA, Selassie AW, Wood KD. Employment after traumatic brain injury: differences between men and women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:1400-9. Objective: To determine whether there are sex differences in employment 1 year after traumatic brain injury. Design: Prospective cohort. Setting: Acute care hospitals in South Carolina and Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems TBIMS) rehabilitation centers. Participants: Subjects in the TBIMS national dataset and the South Carolina Traumatic Brain Injury Follow-up Registry who were expected to be working before injury and followed at 1 year postinjury. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: Change in employment from preinjury to 1 year postinjury. Results: When other measured influences on change in hours worked were held constant, there were significant interactions for sex by age and sex by marital status. Compared with men, women were more likely to decrease hours or stop working, except in the oldest age group (55-64y) in which men were more likely to stop working. For women, there was a pattern showing better employment outcomes as age increased. Decreased employment for women was most evident for married women, who were much more likely to reduce hours or stop working. There was also a tendency for divorced women to be more likely to stop working when compared with divorced men. Conclusions: These findings run counter to the current literature. Although definitive explanations must await future studies, causal factors arising from differential societal behavior toward women as well as discriminatory attitudes about women and employment deserve further study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据