4.5 Article

Influence of type 2 diabetes mellitus on bone mineral density response to bisphosphonates in late postmenopausal osteoporosis

期刊

ADVANCES IN THERAPY
卷 24, 期 6, 页码 1314-1320

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/BF02877778

关键词

type 2 diabetes; osteoporosis; bisphosphonates; alendronate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bisphosphonates are effective agents for postmenopausal osteoporosis, but their efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is not known. The investigators evaluated bone mineral density (BMD) response to alendronate in women with concurrent late postmenopausal osteoporosis and type 2 DM. In a retrospective, matched case-control study, 26 late postmenopausal osteoporotic women with type 2 DM (age, 67.6 +/- 7.3 y; type 2 DM duration, 12.8 +/- 6.8 y; duration of menopause, 10.9 +/- 7.4 y; time on alendronate: 4.8 +/- 2.3 y; body mass index [BMI], 31.4 +/- 6.3 kg/m(2)) were matched with 26 controls according to age, BMI, duration of menopause, and alendronate treatment received. All subjects were given alendronate 10 mg/d or 70 mg/wk, along with sufficient vitamin D (>= 400 IU) and calcium (>= 1 g/d) intake, for 4.8 y. Response to alendronate therapy was determined by assessment of mean percent change in BMD of total hip, femoral neck, forearm, and lateral spine. The presence of type 2 DIM resulted in no difference in spinal BMD response to alendronate therapy. In contrast, BMD in the total hip (mean percent change in BMD, -5.6% vs +1.4%; P=.096), femoral neck (-8.1 % vs +1.1 %, P=.015), and forearm (-3.6% vs +12.7%; P=.013) fell progressively from baseline in subjects with type 2 DM who were taking alendronate for 4.8 y, compared with controls. Elderly, postmenopausal, osteoporotic obese women with type 2 DM are resistant to long-term bisphosphonates, especially in regions of the hip, femoral neck, and forearm compared with the spine. The efficacy of bone resorption inhibitors in patients with type 2 DM, especially in comparison with anabolic agents, should be considered in additional studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据