4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

A fully automated synthesis for the preparation of 68Ga-labelled peptides

期刊

NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 28, 期 11, 页码 870-875

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3282f1753d

关键词

Ga-68; DOTATOC; automated synthesis; peptides; PET

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Generator-produced Ga-68 has attracted increasing interest for radiolabelling peptides used in PET applications. So far, the synthesis of Ga-68-peptide radiopharmaceuticals is mainly based on semi-automated systems. Here we describe a fully automated approach for the synthesis of Ga-68-labelled peptides. Method A commercially available Ga-68 generator was eluted with 0.1 mol . I-1 HCI. Reaction parameters such as buffer conditions, pH range, reaction temperature and time, volume of reaction solution and generator fraction were optimized for labelling DOTA-Tyr(3)-octreotide (DOTATOC). Reaction yields, pH, radiochemical purity, sterility, endotoxins, breakthrough of (68)e and final Ge-68 content were determined. A fully automated radiopharmaceutical synthesis device based on a modular concept for remote-ontrolled processing was developed and evaluated for a number of DOTA-derivatized peptides. Results DOTATOC could be labelled in almost quantitative yields by heating 10-50 nmol peptide at PH 3.5-4.0 for 5 min at 95 degrees C in 1.5 ml. Purification using a reversed-phase cartridge was required to avoid any potential 1 68Ge breakthrough: final activities of Ge-68 were below 100 Bq . ml(-1). Automated synthesis resulted in overall decay-corrected reaction yields of about 60% within 10 min. Even after 1 year using a 1110 MBq generator more than 130 MBq Ga-68-DOTATOC could be obtained. Moreover, it was demonstrated that a variety of DOTA-derivatized peptides can be labelled using identical reaction conditions with high yields. Conclusion The system described allows the fully automated, efficient and rapid preparation of Ga-68-DOTA-derivatized pepticles. It has been used successfully and reliably for routine preparations in clinical studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据