4.6 Article

A near-infrared interferometric survey of debris disk stars -: I.: Probing the hot dust content around ε Eridani and τ Ceti with CHARA/FLUOR

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 475, 期 1, 页码 243-250

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077625

关键词

stars : individual : tau Cet & epsilon Eri; stars : fundamental parameters; circumstellar matter; methods : observational; techniques : interferometric

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. The quest for hot dust in the central region of debris disks requires high resolution and high dynamic range imaging. Nearinfrared interferometry is a powerful means to directly detect faint emission from hot grains. Aims. We probed the first 3AU around tau Ceti and epsilon Eridani with the CHARA array ( Mt Wilson, USA) in order to gauge the 2 mu m excess flux emanating from possible hot dust grains in the debris disks and to also resolve the stellar photospheres. Methods. High precision visibility amplitude measurements were performed with the FLUOR single mode fiber instrument and telescope pairs on baselines ranging from 22 to 241 m of projected length. The short baseline observations allow us to disentangle the contribution of an extended structure from the photospheric emission, while the long baselines constrain the stellar diameter. Results. We have detected a resolved emission around tau Cet, corresponding to a spatially integrated, fractional excess flux of 0.98 +/- 0.21 x 10(-2) with respect to the photospheric flux in the K' band. Around epsilon Eri, our measurements can exclude a fractional excess of greater than 0.6 x 10(-2) (3 sigma). We interpret the photometric excess around t Cet as a possible signature of hot grains in the inner debris disk and demonstrate that a faint, physical or background, companion can be safely excluded. In addition, we measured both stellar angular diameters with an unprecedented accuracy: Theta(LD) (tau Cet) = 2.015 +/- 0.011 mas and Theta(LD)(epsilon Eri) = 2.126 +/- 0.014 mas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据