4.7 Article

Baseline nutritional status is predictive of response to treatment and survival in patients treated by definitive chemoradiotherapy for a locally advanced esophageal cancer

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 102, 期 11, 页码 2557-2563

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01437.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To assess the impact of baseline nutritional status on treatment response and survival in nonmetastatic patients with a locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC) treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Methods: One hundred five patients with LAEC treated by definitive CRT were retrospectively included. The CRT regimen was based on an external radiotherapy (RT) delivered concomitantly to a cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CT). Patients were considered to have a complete response (CR) to CRT when no residual tumor was detected on CT scan and esophagoscopy performed 2 months after the end of CRT. Multivariate analysis of predictive factors of response to CRT and survival were performed using a logistic regression and a Cox model, respectively. Results: Mean value of baseline nutritional parameters was significantly different between nonresponder (N = 42) and responder (N = 63) patients to CRT (weight loss 10% vs 5.8%, P = 0.0047; serum albumin level 35 g/L vs 38.7 g/L, P = 0.0004; BMI 22.8 kg/m(2) vs 25.2 kg/m(2), P = 0.01). n multivariate analysis, serum albumin level > 35 g/L was the only independent predictive factor of CR to CRT (P = 0.009). Independent prognostic factors of survival were BMI > 18 kg/m(2) (P = 0.003), dysphagia Atkinson score < 2 (P = 0.008), dose of RT > 50 Grays (Gy) (P < 0.0001) and CR to CRT (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Survival was influenced by baseline nutritional status as well as dysphagia, dose of RT, and CR to CRT. Despite the retrospective design of the study, our results may provide the concept basis for performing a prospective nutritional intervention study in patients treated by definitive CRT for an esophageal cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据