4.0 Article

Neuroimaging of the serotonin Reuptake site requires high-affinity Ligands

期刊

SYNAPSE
卷 61, 期 11, 页码 882-888

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/syn.20443

关键词

SSRI; rat and monkey brain; species differences; homogenate binding; reference region

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Numerous attempts have been made to develop suitable radiolabeled tracers for positron emission tomography or single photon emission computed tomography imaging of the serotonin transporter (SERT), but most often, negative outcomes are reported. The aim of this study is to define characteristics of a good SERT radioligand and to investigate species differences. We examined seven different selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and that except for one all have been previously tested as emission tomography ligands. The outcome of the ligands as emission tomography tracers was compared in relation with receptor density (B-max) and/or ligand affinity (K-d) in rat and monkey cerebrum and cerebellum (reference region) membranes. [H-3]-(S)-Citalopram and [H-3]-(+)-McN5652 display statistically significantly lower affinity, whereas [H-3]paroxetine displays statistically significantly higher affinity for SERT in monkey cortex when compared with the rat cerebrum. The affinity of [H-3]MADAM, [I-123]ADAM, and [C-11]DASB for SERT obtained with rat cerebrum and monkey cortex are similar. In monkey cortex, Kd and B-max could not be determined with [H-3]fluoxetine. Of the seven SSRIs, [H-3]-(S)-citalopram, [H-3]MADAM, and [C-11]DASB displayed significant specific binding to SERT in monkey cerebellum, with Bmax cortex:cerebellum ratios being 17, 3, and 4, respectively. In rat brain tissue the ratios were 12, 6, and 3, respectively. In conclusion, it can be estimated that imaging of the human SERT in a high-density region requires radioligands with Kd values between 0.03 and a maximum of 0.3 nM (at 37 degrees C). The differential specific cerebellar binding raises the question of the suitability of cerebellum as a reference region for nonspecific binding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据