4.6 Review

Dynamics of parathyroid hormone secretion in health and secondary hyperparathyroidism

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.2215/CJN.01520407

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review examines the dynamics of parathyroid hormone secretion in health and in various causes of secondary hyperparathyroidism. Although most studies of parathyroid hormone and calcium have focused on the modification of parathyroid hormone secretion by serum calcium, the relationship between parathyroid hormone and serum calcium is bifunctional because parathyroid hormone also modifies serum calcium. In normal animals and humans, factors such as phosphorus and vitamin D modify the basal parathyroid hormone level and the maximal parathyroid hormone response to hypocalcemia. Certain medications, such as lithium and estrogen, in normal individuals and sustained changes in the serum calcium concentration in hemodialysis patients change the set point of calcium, which reflects the serum calcium concentration at which parathyroid hormone secretion responds. Hypocalcemia increases the basal/maximal parathyroid hormone ratio, a measure of the relative degree of parathyroid hormone stimulation. The phenomenon of hysteresis, defined as a different parathyroid hormone value for the same serum calcium concentration during the induction of and recovery from hypo- and hypercalcemia, is discussed because it provides important insights into factors that affect parathyroid hormone secretion. In three causes of secondary hyperparathyroidism-chronic kidney disease, vitamin D deficiency, and aging-factors that affect the dynamics of parathyroid hormone secretion are evaluated in detail. During recovery from vitamin D deficiency, the maximal parathyroid hormone remains elevated while the basal parathyroid hormone value rapidly becomes normal because of a shift in the set point of calcium. Much remains to be learned about the dynamics of parathyroid hormone secretion in health and secondary hyperparathyroidism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据