4.7 Article

Frequency of regulatory T cells in renal cell carcinoma patients and investigation of correlation with survival

期刊

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
卷 56, 期 11, 页码 1743-1753

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-007-0318-z

关键词

T regulatory cells; survival; renal cell carcinoma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Regulatory T cells are important in maintaining immune homeostasis, mediating peripheral tolerance and preventing autoimmunity. Increased frequencies of CD4(+)CD25(high) T regulatory (T-Reg) cells have been documented in the peripheral blood of patients with several types of cancer consistent with a role in tumour escape from immunological control. We have investigated the presence of TReg cells systemically and in situ in previously untreated patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Results We have shown that there is a significant increased frequency of CD4(+)CD25(high) T cells in RCC patients (n = 49) compared to normal donors (n = 38), respectively, 2.47% versus 1.50%; P < 0.0001. We confirmed these data using the FOXP3 marker of TReg cells in a subset of these patients and normal donors. The population of TReg cells identified showed the expected phenotype with CD4(+)CD(25high) population in both RCC patients and normal donors contained higher proportions of CD45RO and GITR than CD4(+) CD25(-/low) populations and exhibiting suppressive activity in an anti- CD3 and anti-CD28 induced proliferation assay. CD4(+)FOXP3(+) T cells were detected in the tumour microenvironment by immunofluorescence and the numbers enumerated in lymphocytes recovered following enzymatic disaggregations of biopsies; their frequency was higher in the tumour than the peripheral blood of the same patients. The early follow up data show an association between higher peripheral blood regulatory T-cell count and adverse overall survival. Conclusion These data confirm the increase of T-Reg cells in RCC patients and provide impetus to further investigate modulation of T-Reg activity in RCC patients as part of therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据