4.5 Article

Retention of intravenously infused [13C] bicarbonate is transiently increased during recovery from hard exercise

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 103, 期 5, 页码 1604-1612

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00309.2007

关键词

prior exercise; postexercise; exertion; physical activity; NaHCO3; correction factor; glucose oxidation; fatty acid oxidation; leucine oxidation

资金

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR-42906] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of exercise on energy substrate metabolism persist into the postexercise recovery period. We sought to derive bicarbonate retention factors ( k) to correct for carbon tracer oxidized, but retained from pulmonary excretion before, during, and after exercise. Ten men and nine women received a primed- continuous infusion of [ C-13] bicarbonate ( sodium salt) under three different conditions: 1) before, during, and 3 h after 90 min of exercise at 45% peak oxygen consumption ( V-O2peak); 2) before, during, and 3 h after 60 min of exercise at 65% V-O2peak; and 3) during a time- matched resting control trial, with breath samples collected for determination of (CO2)-C-13 excretion rates. Throughout the resting control trial, k was stable and averaged 0.83 in men and women. During exercise, average k in men was 0.93 at 45% V-O2peak and 0.94 at 65% VO2peak, and in women k was 0.91 at 45% V-O2peak and 0.92 at 65% V-O2peak, with no significant differences between intensities or sexes. After exercise at 45% V-O2peak, k returned rapidly to control values in men and women, but following exercise at 65% V-O2peak, k was significantly less than control at 30 and 60 min postexercise in men ( 0.74 and 0.72, respectively, P < 0.05) and women ( 0.75 and 0.76, respectively, P < 0.05) with no significant postexercise differences between men and women. We conclude that bicarbonate/ CO2 retention is transiently increased in men and women for the first hour of postexercise recovery following endurance exercise bouts of hard but not moderate intensity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据