4.5 Article

Increased catechol-O-methyltransferase activity and protein expression in OX-42-positive cells in the substantia nigra after lipopolysaccharide microinfusion

期刊

NEUROCHEMISTRY INTERNATIONAL
卷 51, 期 6-7, 页码 412-423

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuint.2007.04.020

关键词

catechol-O-methyltransferase; microglia; lipopolysaccharide; OX-42; L-dopa; dopamine; Parkinson's disease; substantia nigra

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activated microglial cells are found in the substantia nigra and the striatum of Parkinson's disease patients. These cells have been shown to express catechol-O-methyltransferase activity which may increase during pathological conditions. Lipopolysaccharides are potent activators of microglial cells. After paranigral lipopolysaccharide infusion to rats we observed intense microglial activation around the lesion area followed by a delayed injury in nigrostriatal pathway in 2 weeks. Simultaneously, catechol-O-methyltransferase activity in the substantia nigra was gradually increased up to 213%. In the Western blot the amount of soluble COMT and membrane bound COMT proteins were increased by 255% and 86%, respectively. Increased catechol-O-methyltransferase immunoreactivity was located primarily into the activated microglial cells in the lesion area. Interestingly, catechol-O-methyltransferase and OX-42 stained also intensively microglia/macrophage-like cells which surrounded the adjacent blood vessels. Inhibition of catechol-O-methyltransferase activity by tolcapone or entacapone did not increase lipopolysaccharide-induced neurotoxicity. We conclude that catechol-O-methyltransferase activity and protein expression were increased in the substantia nigra after inflammation induced by lipopolysaccharides. These changes in glial and perivascular catechol-O-methyltransferase activity may have clinical relevance for Parkinson's disease drug treatment due to increased metabolism of levodopa in the brain. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据