4.4 Article

Molecular mechanism underlying the cerebral effect of Gly-Pro-Glu tripeptide bound to L-dopa in a Parkinson's animal model

期刊

AMINO ACIDS
卷 43, 期 3, 页码 1359-1367

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00726-011-1210-x

关键词

MPTP; PD animal model; LD-GPE; Nrf2; NF-kappa B

资金

  1. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio, Perugia, Italy [2009-010-0437]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxidative stress is a critical contributing factor to neurodegenerative disorders. Therefore, the inhibition of ROS formation, responsible for chronic detrimental neuroinflammation, is an important strategy for preventing the neurodegenerative disease and for neuroprotective therapy. Gly-Pro-Glu (GPE) is the N-terminal tripeptide of insulin-like growth factor-I, which is naturally cleaved in the plasma and brain tissues. GPE has neuroprotective effects since it crosses the blood-CSF and the functional CSF-brain barriers and binds to glial cells. It has been shown that GPE improves motor behaviour in rats after 6-OHDA lesion, although it does not rescue dopaminergic neurons. Thus, we hypothesized that the GPE therapeutic efficacy in a Parkinson model might be improved by combining GPE to l-dopa. Here, we used an animal model that represents a progressive chronic Parkinson's disease (PD) model, characterized by high levels of oxidative stress and inflammation. We showed that the co-drug, in which l-dopa is covalently linked to the GPE tripeptide, by down-regulating the expression of inflammatory genes, decreases the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced inflammatory response and, by up-regulating tyrosine hydroxylase, reduces MPTP-induced neurotoxicity. Furthermore, by determining the nuclear translocation/activation of Nrf2 and NF-kappa B, we showed that systemic administration of the co-drug activates Nrf2-induced antioxidant response while suppressing NF-kappa B inflammatory pathway. Data suggest that the binding of l-dopa to GPE tripeptide might represent a promising strategy to supply l-dopa to parkinsonian patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据