4.1 Review

Therapeutic hypothermia for global and focal ischemic brain injury - A cool way to improve neurologic outcomes

期刊

NEUROLOGIST
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 331-342

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e318154bb79

关键词

cardiac arrest; stroke; ischemia; cooling; induced hypothermia

资金

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [R01-HL-EB-71568] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R44-NS-38016] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) has been employed as a neuroprotective strategy for a wide array of clinical problems since the late 1940s. Animal studies have determined that the neuroprotective effect of hypothermia is pleiotropic, impacting many steps in both the ischemic cascade and reperfusion injury. Interest in the neuroprotective effects of TH for ischernic brain injury has been resurgent, fueled by both recent positive and negative clinical trials. A review of preclinical and clinical reports on TH in adult patients is provided in this article. Review Summary: Animal data and several large clinical studies of mild to moderate TH (32 degrees C-34 degrees C) for global cerebral ischemia describe favorable neurologic outcomes, with few adverse effects. However, clinical implementation for global ischernia remains poor. Some animal data support a role for TH in focal cerebral ischernia, if instituted soon after the onset of ischemia, and in the setting of reperfusion. Clinical studies of TH for focal cerebral ischemia have so far been equivocal. The available data suggest that, despite sharing some common components in the ischernic cascade, focal and global cerebral ischemia are pathophysiologically disparate, and may respond to different neuroprotective strategies. Conclusion: TH is a safe, effective neuroprotective strategy for global cerebral ischemia. Because of the neuroprotective efficacy of TH in adult comatose survivors of cardiac arrest, neurologists should advocate the implementation of TH is strategy. TH for focal ischernia is a promising therapeutic option, but requires more basic and clinical investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据