4.5 Article

Pharmacokinetic modelling of the placental transfer of nelfinavir and its M8 metabolite: a population study using 75 maternal-cord plasma samples

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 64, 期 5, 页码 634-644

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02885.x

关键词

cord plasma concentrations; HIV; nelfinavir; NONMEM; placental transfer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims A population pharmacokinetic model was developed to characterize the transfer of nelfinavir and its active metabolite M8 from maternal to cord plasma and amniotic fluid. Methods Concentration data were obtained from 75 women on the day of delivery and for whom maternal, umbilical plasma and amniotic fluid samples were collected. Data from 53 pregnant, 61 nonpregnant and seven consecutively pregnant and non pregnant women were then added to the database, the contents of which were analyzed using NONMEM. Results Nelfinavir and M8 concentrations in maternal plasma, umbilical plasma and amniotic fluid were described by six connected compartments. Mean (% intersubject variability) population estimates were: absorption rate 00.67 h(-1), lag time 00.87 h, oral clearance and volume of distribution: 39.5 l h(-1) (53%), and 557 l for non pregnant and pregnant women, respectively, and 115 l h(-1) (132%) and 1626 l, respectively, on the day of delivery, M8 formation clearance 0.77 l h(-1) and M8 elimination rate constant 03.41 h(-1) (74%). For nelfinavir and M8, respectively, the mother-to-cord parameters were 0.058 l h(-1) (34%), and 00.35 h(-1) (76%), the cord-to-amniotic fluid rate constants were 0.23 and 00.59 h(-1), and the elimination rate constants from amniotic fluid were 0.36 and 00.49 h(-1). The nelfinavir fetus : maternal concentration ratio was 25% for maternal concentrations between 0.1 and 2.5 mg l(-1), between the 31 and 41st week of gestation. Conclusions The low transfer of nelfinavir from the placenta is unlikely to protect the fetus from vertical HIV-1 transmission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据