4.5 Article

Assessment of sperm chemokinesis with exposure to jelly coats of sea urchin eggs and resact: a microfluidic experiment and numerical study

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 210, 期 21, 页码 3805-3820

出版社

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.005439

关键词

Arbacia punctulata; chemokinesis; microfluidics; sperm; stochastic simulations

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Specific peptides contained within the extracellular layer, or jelly coat, of a sea urchin egg have been hypothesized to play an important role in fertilization, though separate accounting of the effects of chemoattraction, chemokinesis, sperm agglomeration and the other possible roles of the jelly coat have not been reported. In the present study, we used a microfluidic device that allowed determination of the differences in the diffusion coefficients of sperm of the purple sea urchin Arbacia punctulata subjected to two chemoattractants, namely the jelly coat and resact. Our objectives were twofold: (1) to experimentally determine and compare the diffusion coefficients of Arbacia punctulata spermatozoa in seawater, jelly coat solution and resact solution; and (2) to determine the effect of sea urchin sperm diffusion coefficient and egg size on the sperm-egg collision frequency using stochastic simulations. Numerical values of the diffusion coefficients obtained by diffusing the spermatozoa in seawater, resact solution and jelly coat solution were used to quantify the chemotactic effect. This allowed direct incorporation of known enlargements of the egg, and altered sperm diffusion coefficients in the presence of chemoattractant, in the stochastic simulations. Simulation results showed that increase in diffusion coefficient values and egg diameter values increased the collision frequency. From the simulation results, we concluded that type of sperm, egg diameter and diffusion coefficient are significant factors in egg fertilization. Increasing the motility of sperm appears to be the prominent role of the jelly coat.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据