4.4 Article

The non-protein amino acid β-N-methylamino-L-alanine in Portuguese cyanobacterial isolates

期刊

AMINO ACIDS
卷 42, 期 6, 页码 2473-2479

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00726-011-1057-1

关键词

AQC; BMAA; Cyanobacteria; Neurotoxin; HPLC-FD; Estuaries

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/44373/2008]
  2. INCITE
  3. U. Porto/Santander Totta
  4. Interreg program
  5. [REEQ/304/QUI/2005]
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/44373/2008] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tailor made amino acid beta-N-methyl-amino-L-alanine (BMAA) is a neurotoxin produced by cyanobacteria. It has been associated with certain forms of progressive neurodegenerative disease, including sporadic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Alzheimer's disease. Some different reports of BMAA in cyanobacterial blooms from lakes, reservoirs, and other water resources have been made by different investigators. We here report the detection of BMAA of both free and protein-bound produced by cyanobacteria, belonging to the Chroococcales, Oscillatoriales and Nostocales ordered. We use a rapid and sensitive HPLC-FD method that utilizes methanol elution and the Waters AQC Tag chemistry. On other hand, we have used three different assay procedures for BMAA extraction from cyanobacteria: Trichloroacetic acid (TCA), Methanol/Acetone and hydrochloric acid (HCl). All assays let successfully detect BMAA in all cyanobacteria samples analyzed. Nevertheless, with TCA and HCl extraction procedures the highest BMAA values, for free as well as protein-bound BMAA were detected. BMAA content could not be related to the taxonomy of the isolates or to their geographical origin, and no correlation between free and protein-bound BMAA concentrations were observed within or between taxonomic groups. These data offer confirmation of the taxonomic and geographic ubiquity of BMAA from naturally occurring populations of cyanobacteria, for the first time reported for estuaries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据