4.5 Article Retracted Publication

被撤回的出版物: A regulatory circuit mediating convergence between Nurr1 transcriptional regulation and Wnt signaling (Retracted article. See vol. 34, pg. 917, 2014)

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
卷 27, 期 21, 页码 7486-7496

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00409-07

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The orphan nuclear receptor Nurr1 is essential for the development and maintenance of midbrain dopaminergic neurons, the cells that degenerate during Parkinson's disease, by promoting the transcription of genes involved in dopaminergic neurotransmission. Since Nurr1 lacks a classical ligand-binding pocket, it is not clear which factors regulate its activity and how these factors are affected during disease pathogenesis. Since Wnt signaling via beta-catenin promotes the differentiation of Nurr1(+) dopaminergic precursors in vitro, we tested for functional interactions between these systems. We found that beta-catenin and Nurr1 functionally interact at multiple levels. In the absence of P-catenin, Nurr1 is associated with Lef-1 in corepressor complexes. P-Catenin binds Nurr1 and disrupts these corepressor complexes, leading: to coactivator recruitment and induction of Wnt- and Nurr1-responsive genes. We then identified KCNIP,4/calsenilin-like protein as being responsive to concurrent activation by Nurr1 and beta-catenin. Since KCNIP4 interacts with presenilins, the Alzheimer's disease-associated proteins that promote beta-catenin degradation, we tested the possibility that KCNIP4 induction regulates beta-catenin signaling. KCNIP4 induction limited beta-catenin activity in a presenilindependent manner, thereby serving as a negative feedback loop; furthermore, Nurr1 inhibition of beta-catenin activity was absent in PS1 (-/-) cells or in the presence of small interfering RNAs specific to KCNIP4. These data describe regulatory convergence between Nurr1 and beta-catenin, providing a mechanism by which Nurr1 could be regulated by Wnt signaling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据