4.0 Article

A story half untold: Adiposity, adipokines and outcomes in dialysis population

期刊

SEMINARS IN DIALYSIS
卷 20, 期 6, 页码 493-497

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2007.00358.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK077298] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In contrast to the associations of high body mass index (BMI) with increased mortality in the general population, high BMI is associated with better survival in dialysis patients. Nonetheless, high BMI/adiposity in chronic kidney disease (CKD)/dialysis patients is associated with insulin resistance, inflammation, dyslipidemia, atherosclerosis and coronary calcification as described in the general population. These apparently perplexing associations might be explained if (1) adiposity has dual competing effects on survival; a protective nutritional effect and a deleterious metabolic effect resulting in insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, hypertension and inflammation and (2) the level of kidney function modifies the relative importance of these effects. In this paradigm, the deleterious metabolic effects of obesity outweigh its protective nutritional effects in the non-CKD population, the deleterious metabolic effects of obesity are neutralized by its protective nutritional effects in the moderate CKD population and the deleterious metabolic effects of obesity are outweighed by its protective nutritional effects in stage V CKD on dialysis. In other words, the over-all effects of obesity on survival vary according to the level of kidney function and there is an interaction of body size and presence or absence of CKD on survival even though the metabolic effects of adiposity are not modified by the level of kidney function. Therefore, we propose that despite an association of adiposity with better survival, there is no reverse epidemiology of the associations traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors and disease with adiposity in dialysis patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据