4.6 Article

Role of the aerosol substrate in the heterogeneous ozonation reactions of surface-bound PAHs

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 111, 期 43, 页码 11050-11058

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp075300i

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To probe how the aerosol substrate influences heterogeneous polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) oxidation, we investigated the reaction of surface-bound anthracene with gas-phase ozone on phenylsiloxane oil and azelaic acid aerosols under dry conditions in an aerosol how tube with offline analysis of anthracene. The reaction exhibited pseudo-first-order kinetics for anthracene loss, and the pseudo-first-order rate coefficients displayed a Langmuir-Hinshelwood dependence on the gas-phase ozone concentration on both aerosol substrates. The following parameters were found: for the reaction on phenylsiloxane oil aerosols, K-O3 = (1.0 +/- 0.4) x 10(-13) Cm-3 and k(max)(I) = (0.010 +/- 0.003) s(-1); for the reaction on azelaic acid aerosols, K-O3 = (2.2 +/- 0.9) x 10(-15) cm(3) and k(max)(I) = (0.057 +/- 0.009) s(-1), where K-O3 is a parameter that describes the partitioning of ozone to the surface and kI(max) is the maximum pseudo-first-order rate coefficient at high ozone concentrations. The K 03 value for the reaction of surface-bound anthracene and ozone on azelaic acid aerosols is similar to the K-O3 value that we obtained in our previous study for the reaction of surface-bound benzo[a]pyrene and ozone on the same substrate. This finding supports our earlier hypothesis that the substrate influences the partitioning of ozone to the surface irrespective of the organic species (i.e., PAH) adsorbed to it. Preliminary ab initio calculations were performed to investigate whether there is a relationship between the relative binding energies of the ozone-substrate complex and the K-O3 values for the different substrates studied. A comparison between kinetic results obtained on aerosol substrates and thin films is presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据