4.5 Article

Securinine, a GABAA receptor antagonist, enhances macrophage clearance of phase IIC. bumetfi:: comparison with TLR agonists

期刊

JOURNAL OF LEUKOCYTE BIOLOGY
卷 82, 期 5, 页码 1062-1069

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1189/jlb.0407255

关键词

adjuvant therapy; innate immunity; antimicrobial drugs; infectious disease; leukocyte

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [5 P20 RR020185-02] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [1 U54 AI06537-02] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Innate immune cell stimulation represents a complementary approach to vaccines and antimicrobial drugs to counter infectious disease. We have used assays of macrophage activation and in vitro and in vivo phase 11 Coxiella burnetii infection models to compare and contrast the activity of a novel innate immune cell agonist, securinine, with known TLR agonists. As expected, TLR agonists, such as LPS (TLR4) and fibroblast-stimulating lipopeptide-1 (FSL-1; TLR2), induced macrophage activation and increased macrophage killing of phase 11 C. burnetii in vitro. FSL-1 also induced accelerated killing of C. burnetii in vivo. Securinine, a gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor antagonist, was found to induce TLR-independent macrophage activation in vitro, leading to IL-8 secretion, L-selectin down-regulation, and CD11b and MHC Class 11 antigen up-regulation. As seen with the TLR agonists, securinine also induced accelerated macrophage killing of C. burnetii in vitro and in vivo. In summary, as predicted by the literature, TLR agonists enhance macrophage killing of phase 11 C. burnetti in vitro, and at least for TLR2 agonists, this activity occurs in vivo as well. Securinine represents a novel macrophage agonist, which has similar effects as TLR agonists in this model yet apparently, does not act through known TLRs. Securinine has minimal toxicity in vivo, suggesting it or structurally similar compounds may represent novel, therapeutic adjuvants, which increase resistance to intracellular pathogens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据